- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- CH35 vs SFL7002T/10
GP CH35 vs Philips SFL7002T/10
What CH35 does better (2) and where SFL7002T/10 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Brightness & throw4.8
5.7Battery & charging2.0
2.5Build & durability2.5
Why is CH35 better than SFL7002T/10?
- Maximum runtime60 h vs 3 h20×
- RechargeableYes · SFL7002T/10: No
Why is SFL7002T/10 better than CH35?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 1,200 lm2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)130 m vs 200 m+54%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 130 m | 200 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AA |
| Number of batteries | 3 | 6 |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | 3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Green | Black |
