How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Headfire 280 Sensor vs 15168002-Kopflampe

Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor vs Mil Tec 15168002-Kopflampe

What Headfire 280 Sensor does better (1) and where 15168002-Kopflampe wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor
Kerbl · 2025Headfire 280 Sensor
6.6Score
1 advantage≈ $12
Higher score
vs
Mil Tec 15168002-Kopflampe
Mil Tec · 202515168002-Kopflampe
5.9Score
0 advantages≈ $9
5.2Brightness & throw2.9
8.8Build & durability8.8

Why is Headfire 280 Sensor better than 15168002-Kopflampe?

  1. Maximum output280 lm vs 200 lm+40%

Why is 15168002-Kopflampe better than Headfire 280 Sensor?

15168002-Kopflampe has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output280 lm200 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)140 m—
Light sourceCOB LED panelLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs—2
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoAAA
Battery capacity800 mAh—
Maximum runtime—24 h
RechargeableYes—
USB-C chargingYes—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to2 m2 m
Body materialPlastic / polymerPlastic / polymer
Modes & features
Red light—Yes
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare