- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Headfire 280 Sensor vs wiederaufladbar
Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor vs Mil Tec wiederaufladbar
What Headfire 280 Sensor does better (1) and where wiederaufladbar wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Brightness & throw2.2
8.8Build & durability8.8
Why is Headfire 280 Sensor better than wiederaufladbar?
- Maximum output280 lm vs 80 lm3.5×
Why is wiederaufladbar better than Headfire 280 Sensor?
wiederaufladbar has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | 80 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 140 m | — |
| Light source | COB LED panel | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 200 mm |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
