- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Headfire 280 Sensor vs UT27
Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor vs Nitecore UT27
What Headfire 280 Sensor does better (1) and where UT27 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw7.0
3.6Battery & charging3.8
8.8Build & durability4.8
Why is Headfire 280 Sensor better than UT27?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is UT27 better than Headfire 280 Sensor?
- Maximum output280 lm vs 800 lm2.9×
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+88%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)140 m vs 168 m+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 7,124 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 140 m | 168 m |
| Light source | COB LED panel | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 97 |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 14 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 74 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
