- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Headfire 280 Sensor vs Stirnlampe
Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor vs Perel Stirnlampe
What Headfire 280 Sensor does better (1) and where Stirnlampe wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Build & durability7.6
Why is Headfire 280 Sensor better than Stirnlampe?
- Submersible to2 m vs 1.5 m+33%
Why is Stirnlampe better than Headfire 280 Sensor?
Stirnlampe has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 140 m | — |
| Light source | COB LED panel | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 7 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
