- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Headfire 280 Sensor vs COB SXLS50100E
Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor vs Stanley COB SXLS50100E
What Headfire 280 Sensor does better (1) and where COB SXLS50100E wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw3.5
8.8Build & durability7.3
Why is Headfire 280 Sensor better than COB SXLS50100E?
- Submersible to2 m vs 1.5 m+33%
Why is COB SXLS50100E better than Headfire 280 Sensor?
- Maximum output280 lm vs 300 lm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | 300 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 140 m | — |
| Light source | COB LED panel | COB LED panel |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | — | 10 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Maximus StirnlampevsKerbl Headfire 280 Sensor
vsKodak 150 lm 887930413861vsKerbl Headfire 280 Sensorvs
Kerbl Headfire 280 SensorvsMactronic Falcon Eye Orion
vsScangrip HEAD LITE 150vsKerbl Headfire 280 Sensorvs
Maximus StirnlampevsStanley COB SXLS50100E
vsBlack Cat Night Vision 1500vsStanley COB SXLS50100E5.65.3