- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Headfire 280 Sensor vs H330
Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor vs XCell H330
What Headfire 280 Sensor does better (0) and where H330 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw3.8
3.6Battery & charging2.8
8.8Build & durability7.8
Why is Headfire 280 Sensor better than H330?
Headfire 280 Sensor has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is H330 better than Headfire 280 Sensor?
- Maximum output280 lm vs 330 lm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | 330 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 140 m | — |
| Light source | COB LED panel | COB LED panel |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | — | 3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 4 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 100 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
