- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PL-023.2 UV UV-LED vs Flash 600 R
Kunzer PL-023.2 UV UV-LED vs Scangrip Flash 600 R
What PL-023.2 UV UV-LED does better (0) and where Flash 600 R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Brightness & throw6.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is PL-023.2 UV UV-LED better than Flash 600 R?
PL-023.2 UV UV-LED has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Flash 600 R better than PL-023.2 UV UV-LED?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 600 lm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 600 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 150 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 185 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 38 mm |
| Weight | — | 250 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| UV light | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips X60PILLX1 Xperion 6000 PillarvsKunzer PL-023.2 UV UV-LED
vsPhilips X60UVPIX1 Xperion 6000 UV PillarvsKunzer PL-023.2 UV UV-LED6.66.2
vsPhilips X60POCKX1 Xperion 6000vsKunzer PL-023.2 UV UV-LED
vsScangrip Mag7vsKunzer PL-023.2 UV UV-LED
vs
Makita DEADML806vsScangrip Flash 600 R7.97.4
vsMilwaukee IR PL250vsScangrip Flash 600 R8.07.4