- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H15R Core vs Nao LT
Ledlenser H15R Core vs Petzl Nao LT
What H15R Core does better (4) and where Nao LT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is H15R Core better than Nao LT?
- Maximum output2,500 lm vs 600 lm4.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)299 m vs 75 m4×
- Peak beam intensity22,350 cd vs 1,410 cd15.9×
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 1,250 mAh3.8×
Why is Nao LT better than H15R Core?
- Weight380 g vs 90 g4.2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 85 h+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,500 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 22,350 cd | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 299 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 70 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 380 g | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
