How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,011 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. HF4 vs Nao LT

Ledlenser HF4 vs Petzl Nao LT

What HF4 does better (0) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Ledlenser HF4
Ledlenser · 2026HF4
0 advantages≈ $35
vs
Petzl Nao LT
Petzl · 2026Nao LT
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $75
Higher score
5.2Brightness & throw4.5

Why is HF4 better than Nao LT?

HF4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Nao LT better than HF4?

  1. Maximum output450 lm vs 600 lm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Petzl Nao LTPetzl Nao LT≈ $756.7
Light output
Maximum output450 lm600 lm
Peak beam intensity—1,410 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—75 m
Runtime at maximum output—120 min
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
Battery—AAA
Number of batteries—3
Battery capacity—1,250 mAh
Maximum runtime—85 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time—3.5 h
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Size & weight
Weight—90 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
Green / blue / RGB lightYes—
Motion / reactive sensor—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare