- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HF7R vs Nao LT
Ledlenser HF7R vs Petzl Nao LT
What HF7R does better (2) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HF7R better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)210 m vs 75 m2.8×
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 600 lm2×
Why is Nao LT better than HF7R?
- Maximum runtime60 h vs 85 h+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 210 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
