- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K4R vs K6R roségold
Ledlenser K4R vs Ledlenser K6R roségold
What K4R does better (2) and where K6R roségold wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Brightness & throw6.8
2.3Battery & charging2.4
8.3Build & durability2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
K4RK6R roségold
| K4R | K6R roségold | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 50.8 mm | 66 mm | −15.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 22 mm | 30 mm | −8 mm |
| Weight | 20 g | 32 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K4R better than K6R roségold?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)99 m vs 80 m+24%
- Weight20 g vs 32 g+62%
Why is K6R roségold better than K4R?
- Maximum output120 lm vs 400 lm3.3×
- Maximum runtime3.5 h vs 8 h2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 120 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,450 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 99 m | 80 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 3.5 h | 8 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP2X | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 50.8 mm | 66 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 22 mm | 30 mm |
| Weight | 20 g | 32 g |
