- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K6R roségold vs i1R 2 EOS
Ledlenser K6R roségold vs Olight i1R 2 EOS
What K6R roségold does better (2) and where i1R 2 EOS wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Brightness & throw4.1
2.5Battery & charging3.0
3.0Build & durability9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
K6R roségoldi1R 2 EOS
| K6R roségold | i1R 2 EOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66 mm | 44 mm | +22 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 14 mm | +16 mm |
| Weight | 32 g | 14 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K6R roségold better than i1R 2 EOS?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 150 lm2.7×
- Maximum runtime8 h vs 6 h+33%
Why is i1R 2 EOS better than K6R roségold?
- Weight32 g vs 14 g2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 150 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 80 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 8 h | 6 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.2 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66 mm | 44 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 14 mm |
| Weight | 32 g | 14 g |
