- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Kidled4R vs Nao LT
Ledlenser Kidled4R vs Petzl Nao LT
What Kidled4R does better (0) and where Nao LT wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is Kidled4R better than Nao LT?
Kidled4R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Nao LT better than Kidled4R?
- Maximum output40 lm vs 600 lm15×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)25 m vs 75 m3×
- Peak beam intensity160 cd vs 1,410 cd8.8×
- Maximum runtime18 h vs 85 h4.7×
- USB-C chargingNo · Kidled4R: Yes
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 40 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 160 cd | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 25 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 18 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
