- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MH3 vs Nao LT
Ledlenser MH3 vs Petzl Nao LT
What MH3 does better (1) and where Nao LT wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is MH3 better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)130 m vs 75 m+73%
Why is Nao LT better than MH3?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 600 lm3×
- Maximum runtime35 h vs 85 h2.4×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Weight92 g vs 90 g+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 130 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 35 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | — |
| Weight | 92 g | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
