- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MH3 vs Nao RL
Ledlenser MH3 vs Petzl Nao RL
What MH3 does better (1) and where Nao RL wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is MH3 better than Nao RL?
- Weight92 g vs 145 g+58%
Why is Nao RL better than MH3?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 1,500 lm7.5×
- Maximum runtime35 h vs 80 h2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)130 m vs 200 m+54%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 130 m | 200 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 1,440 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 35 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | — |
| Weight | 92 g | 145 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
