- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Camo II vs NU25 MCT
Mactronic Camo II vs Nitecore NU25 MCT
What Camo II does better (3) and where NU25 MCT wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is Camo II better than NU25 MCT?
- Maximum output490 lm vs 400 lm+23%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m vs 132 m+11%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is NU25 MCT better than Camo II?
NU25 MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 490 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 4,351 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 147 m | 132 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 700 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 45 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 50 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black, White |
