How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Camo II vs NU25 MCT UL

Mactronic Camo II vs Nitecore NU25 MCT UL

What Camo II does better (2) and where NU25 MCT UL wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Mactronic Camo II
Mactronic · 2025Camo II
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
vs
Nitecore NU25 MCT UL
Nitecore · 2025NU25 MCT UL
7.2Score
0 advantages≈ $40
6.6Brightness & throw5.8
8.8Build & durability8.8

Why is Camo II better than NU25 MCT UL?

  1. Maximum output490 lm vs 400 lm+23%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m vs 132 m+11%

Why is NU25 MCT UL better than Camo II?

NU25 MCT UL has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output490 lm400 lm
Peak beam intensity—4,360 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m132 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L—
LED makerCree—
Colour temperature—3,000K
Adjustable colour temperature—Yes
Battery & charging
BatteryAA—
Number of batteries—1
Battery capacity—700 mAh
Maximum runtime—45 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP66
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to2 m2 m
Body material—Plastic / polymer
Modes & features
SOS / beacon—Yes
Red light—Yes
Lockout—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare