How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Camo II vs Stirnlampe

Mactronic Camo II vs Origin Outdoors Stirnlampe

What Camo II does better (1) and where Stirnlampe wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Mactronic Camo II
Mactronic · 2025Camo II
9.1Score
1 advantage≈ $35
Higher score
vs
Origin Outdoors Stirnlampe
Origin Outdoors · 2023Stirnlampe
7.1Score
1 advantage≈ $35
6.6Brightness & throw6.1
8.8Build & durability8.8

Why is Camo II better than Stirnlampe?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m vs 125 m+18%

Why is Stirnlampe better than Camo II?

  1. Maximum output490 lm vs 500 lm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output490 lm500 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m125 m
Light sourceLEDCOB LED panel
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
BatteryAA—
Battery capacity—1,200 mAh
Maximum runtime—8 h
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time—3 h
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to2 m2 m
Body material—Plastic / polymer
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare