- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Camo II vs Stirnlampe
Mactronic Camo II vs Origin Outdoors Stirnlampe
What Camo II does better (1) and where Stirnlampe wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Brightness & throw6.1
8.8Build & durability8.8
Why is Camo II better than Stirnlampe?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m vs 125 m+18%
Why is Stirnlampe better than Camo II?
- Maximum output490 lm vs 500 lm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 490 lm | 500 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 147 m | 125 m |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 8 h |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |









