- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Camo II vs Actik 450
Mactronic Camo II vs Petzl Actik 450
What Camo II does better (2) and where Actik 450 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is Camo II better than Actik 450?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m vs 100 m+47%
- Maximum output490 lm vs 450 lm+9%
Why is Actik 450 better than Camo II?
Actik 450 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 490 lm | 450 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 147 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AAA |
| Maximum runtime | — | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Blue |
