- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Camo II vs ACTIK red 400
Mactronic Camo II vs Petzl ACTIK red 400
What Camo II does better (2) and where ACTIK red 400 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Brightness & throw5.3
Why is Camo II better than ACTIK red 400?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m vs 100 m+47%
- Maximum output490 lm vs 450 lm+9%
Why is ACTIK red 400 better than Camo II?
ACTIK red 400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 490 lm | 450 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 147 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AAA |
| Maximum runtime | — | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Red, Black |
