- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Camo II vs E7
Mactronic Camo II vs Wuben E7
What Camo II does better (1) and where E7 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Camo II better than E7?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)147 m vs 132 m+11%
Why is E7 better than Camo II?
- Maximum output490 lm vs 1,800 lm3.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 490 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 4,360 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 147 m | 132 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | — |
| LED maker | Cree | Osram |
| Number of LEDs | — | 6 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | 18650 Li-ion, 18350 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | — | 180 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 6 |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
