How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. EOS 15LRZ vs Shark

Mares EOS 15LRZ vs Oceama Shark

What EOS 15LRZ does better (1) and where Shark wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Mares EOS 15LRZ
Mares · 2022EOS 15LRZ
1 advantage≈ $210
vs
Oceama Shark
Oceama · 2024Shark
8.4Score
0 advantages≈ $260
Higher score
7.5Build & durability3.1

Why is EOS 15LRZ better than Shark?

  1. Submersible to120 m vs 100 m+20%

Why is Shark better than EOS 15LRZ?

Shark has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Oceama SharkOceama Shark≈ $2608.4
Light output
Maximum output—2,500 lm
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-G2Cree XHP50.2
LED makerCreeCree
Number of LEDs3—
Colour temperature7,300K—
Battery & charging
Battery—26650 Li-ion
Battery capacity—5,000 mAh
Maximum runtime—1.5 h
Rechargeable—Yes
Charging time6 h—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to120 m100 m
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height204 mm200 mm
Head diameter / width34 mm—
Weight—496 g
Modes & features
SOS / beacon—Yes
ColoursSilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare