- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EOS 32LRZ vs Kaiman
Mares EOS 32LRZ vs Oceama Kaiman
What EOS 32LRZ does better (3) and where Kaiman wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is EOS 32LRZ better than Kaiman?
- Maximum runtime4.4 h vs 1 h4.4×
- Weight605 g vs 637 g+5%
- Submersible to120 m vs 100 m+20%
Why is Kaiman better than EOS 32LRZ?
- Maximum output930 lm vs 4,000 lm4.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 930 lm | 4,000 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70.2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 26650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 4.4 h | 1 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | 7 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 120 m | 100 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 225 mm | 215 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Weight | 605 g | 637 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
