How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. 15168002-Kopflampe vs H330

Mil Tec 15168002-Kopflampe vs XCell H330

What 15168002-Kopflampe does better (1) and where H330 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Mil Tec 15168002-Kopflampe
Mil Tec · 202515168002-Kopflampe
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $9
Higher score
vs
XCell H330
XCell · 2024H330
5.5Score
1 advantage≈ $11
2.9Brightness & throw4.1
8.8Build & durability7.9
5.9Features5.9

Why is 15168002-Kopflampe better than H330?

  1. Maximum runtime24 h vs 3 h8×

Why is H330 better than 15168002-Kopflampe?

  1. Maximum output200 lm vs 330 lm+65%
Specifications

Side by side

XCell H330XCell H330≈ $115.5
Light output
Maximum output200 lm330 lm
Light sourceLEDCOB LED panel
LED & beam
Number of LEDs22
Battery & charging
BatteryAAABuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Number of batteries—1
Maximum runtime24 h3 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time—4 h
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to2 m2 m
Body materialPlastic / polymerPlastic / polymer
Size & weight
Weight—100 g
Modes & features
Red lightYesYes
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare