How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah vs SWIFT LT

Milwaukee BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah vs Petzl SWIFT LT

What BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah does better (1) and where SWIFT LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Milwaukee BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $70
vs
Petzl SWIFT LT
Petzl · 2026SWIFT LT
4.8Score
1 advantage≈ $45
Higher score
6.4Brightness & throw3.6
2.6Battery & charging4.5

Why is BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah better than SWIFT LT?

  1. Maximum output600 lm vs 380 lm+58%

Why is SWIFT LT better than BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah?

  1. Maximum runtime12 h vs 60 h5×
Specifications

Side by side

Petzl SWIFT LTPetzl SWIFT LT≈ $454.8
Light output
Maximum output600 lm380 lm
Peak beam intensity—1,220 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—70 m
Runtime at maximum output—120 min
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity—880 mAh
Maximum runtime12 h60 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time—3 h
Build & durability
Body material—Plastic / polymer
Size & weight
Weight—43 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare