- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Hl-Sf vs iStar Natural
Milwaukee Hl-Sf vs Nextorch iStar Natural
What Hl-Sf does better (2) and where iStar Natural wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Brightness & throw4.0
2.6Build & durability4.1
Why is Hl-Sf better than iStar Natural?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 80 m+25%
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 21 h+19%
Why is iStar Natural better than Hl-Sf?
iStar Natural has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 450 lm | 450 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 80 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,100 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 21 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 67 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 39 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 32 mm |
| Weight | — | 70 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
