- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- IR PL250 vs EcoPro20
Milwaukee IR PL250 vs Philips EcoPro20
What IR PL250 does better (2) and where EcoPro20 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is IR PL250 better than EcoPro20?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx0
- Maximum output250 lm vs 220 lm+14%
Why is EcoPro20 better than IR PL250?
EcoPro20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 250 lm | 220 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 3.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP20 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx0 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 248 mm |
| Weight | — | 385 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
