- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- C61 vs E51D
Nextorch C61 vs Nextorch E51D
What C61 does better (3) and where E51D wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C61E51D
| C61 | E51D | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 165 mm | 142 mm | +23 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 27 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 95 g | +80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C61 better than E51D?
- Maximum runtime500 h vs 55 h9.1×
- Maximum output3,500 lm vs 2,100 lm+67%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 2,600 mAh+85%
Why is E51D better than C61?
- Weight175 g vs 95 g+84%
- Impact resistance (drop)1 m vs 2 m2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,500 lm | 2,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 18,906 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 275 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 2,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 500 h | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 165 mm | 142 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 27 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 28.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 175 g | 95 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
