- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E51D vs E52D
Nextorch E51D vs Nextorch E52D
What E51D does better (1) and where E52D wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E51DE52D
| E51D | E52D | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 142 mm | 153 mm | −11 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 27 mm | 30 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 130 g | −35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E51D better than E52D?
- Weight95 g vs 130 g+37%
Why is E52D better than E51D?
- Maximum output2,100 lm vs 3,700 lm+76%
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+85%
- Maximum runtime55 h vs 60 h+9%
- Peak beam intensity18,906 cd vs 19,600 cd+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,100 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,906 cd | 19,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 275 m | 280 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 55 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 142 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 27 mm | 30 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
