- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E51D vs TA30C
Nextorch E51D vs Nextorch TA30C
What E51D does better (3) and where TA30C wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E51DTA30C
| E51D | TA30C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 142 mm | 136 mm | +6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 27 mm | 30 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 97 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E51D better than TA30C?
- Maximum output2,100 lm vs 1,600 lm+31%
- Maximum runtime55 h vs 50 h+10%
- Weight95 g vs 97 g+2%
Why is TA30C better than E51D?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)275 m vs 303 m+10%
- Peak beam intensity18,906 cd vs 22,950 cd+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,100 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,906 cd | 22,950 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 275 m | 303 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 55 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 142 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 27 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 97 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
