- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- iStar Natural vs 514652F
Nextorch iStar Natural vs Underwater Kinetics 514652F
What iStar Natural does better (1) and where 514652F wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Brightness & throw5.6
4.0Build & durability2.4
Why is iStar Natural better than 514652F?
- Maximum output450 lm vs 170 lm2.6×
Why is 514652F better than iStar Natural?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)80 m vs 192 m2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 450 lm | 170 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,600 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 80 m | 192 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 4 |
| Battery capacity | 1,100 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 21 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 67 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 39 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | — |
| Weight | 70 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Yellow, Black |
