- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K3 V2.0 vs i1R 2 EOS
Nextorch K3 V2.0 vs Olight i1R 2 EOS
What K3 V2.0 does better (2) and where i1R 2 EOS wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
K3 V2.0i1R 2 EOS
| K3 V2.0 | i1R 2 EOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 44 mm | +106 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 14 mm | 14 mm | = |
| Weight | 28 g | 14 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K3 V2.0 better than i1R 2 EOS?
- Maximum runtime20 h vs 6 h3.3×
- Maximum output250 lm vs 150 lm+67%
Why is i1R 2 EOS better than K3 V2.0?
- Weight28 g vs 14 g2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 250 lm | 150 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 900 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 60 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 20 h | 6 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.2 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 44 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 14 mm | 14 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | — |
| Weight | 28 g | 14 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
