- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MAX STAR vs oStar
Nextorch MAX STAR vs Nextorch oStar
What MAX STAR does better (3) and where oStar wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MAX STARoStar
| MAX STAR | oStar | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 73 mm | 78 mm | −5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 65 mm | −5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 33 mm | 46 mm | −13 mm |
| Weight | 147 g | 87 g | +60 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MAX STAR better than oStar?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 500 lm2.4×
- Peak beam intensity10,000 cd vs 4,290 cd2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m vs 131 m+53%
Why is oStar better than MAX STAR?
- Weight147 g vs 87 g+69%
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 60 h+50%
- Impact resistance (drop)1 m vs 2 m2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,000 cd | 4,290 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 200 m | 131 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | 2 m |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 73 mm | 78 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 65 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 33 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 147 g | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
