- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TA21 IR vs Oclip 2 Ultra Premium
Nextorch TA21 IR vs Olight Oclip 2 Ultra Premium
What TA21 IR does better (3) and where Oclip 2 Ultra Premium wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Brightness & throw3.4
4.0Battery & charging6.2
9.3Build & durability5.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is TA21 IR better than Oclip 2 Ultra Premium?
- Maximum output1,300 lm vs 580 lm2.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)160 m vs 130 m+23%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is Oclip 2 Ultra Premium better than TA21 IR?
- Maximum runtime20 h vs 144 h7.2×
- Weight97 g vs 80 g+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 580 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 6,400 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 160 m | 130 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 20 h | 144 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.8 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 98 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | — |
| Weight | 97 g | 80 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
