How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,011 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TA30C Max vs Freyr

Nextorch TA30C Max vs Olight Freyr

What TA30C Max does better (2) and where Freyr wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Nextorch TA30C Max
Nextorch · 2023TA30C Max
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $130
vs
Olight Freyr
Olight · 2021Freyr
9.4Score
0 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
7.5Brightness & throw6.5
7.3Battery & charging9.7
7.2Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

TA30C MaxFreyr
38 × 15340 × 136
TA30C MaxFreyrDifference
Length / height153 mm136 mm+17 mm
Head diameter / width38 mm40 mm−2 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TA30C Max better than Freyr?

  1. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,750 lm+71%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)390 m vs 360 m+8%

Why is Freyr better than TA30C Max?

Freyr has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Olight FreyrOlight Freyr≈ $1309.4
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm1,750 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)390 m360 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Number of batteries1—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime—360 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to2 m—
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height153 mm136 mm
Head diameter / width38 mm40 mm
Modes & features
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare