- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT22 vs Oclip
Nextorch UT22 vs Olight Oclip
What UT22 does better (2) and where Oclip wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT22 better than Oclip?
- Battery capacity640 mAh vs 280 mAh2.3×
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 12 h2.1×
Why is Oclip better than UT22?
- Maximum output11 lm vs 300 lm27.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 11 lm | 300 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 70 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 22 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 640 mAh | 280 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 12 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 48 mm |
| Weight | — | 30 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
