- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT30 vs Oclip
Nextorch UT30 vs Olight Oclip
What UT30 does better (2) and where Oclip wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT30 better than Oclip?
- Battery capacity640 mAh vs 280 mAh2.3×
- Maximum output320 lm vs 300 lm+7%
Why is Oclip better than UT30?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)55 m vs 70 m+27%
- Weight41 g vs 30 g+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 320 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 760 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 55 m | 70 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 640 mAh | 280 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 12 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 48 mm |
| Weight | 41 g | 30 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
