- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT31 vs Flex Wear
Nextorch UT31 vs Scangrip Flex Wear
What UT31 does better (3) and where Flex Wear wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT31 better than Flex Wear?
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 4 h4×
- Maximum output220 lm vs 150 lm+47%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)53 m vs 45 m+18%
Why is Flex Wear better than UT31?
- Battery capacity640 mAh vs 800 mAh+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 220 lm | 150 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 702 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 53 m | 45 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 640 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 4 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 61 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 53 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 30 mm | — |
| Weight | 50 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
