- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E4K vs MH10 V2.0
Nitecore E4K vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What E4K does better (2) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E4KMH10 V2.0
| E4K | MH10 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 118 mm | 130 mm | −12 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 25 mm | +4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E4K better than MH10 V2.0?
- Maximum output4,400 lm vs 1,000 lm4.4×
- Maximum runtime700 h vs 520 h+35%
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than E4K?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)211 m vs 232 m+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,400 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 211 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 700 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 118 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 25 mm |
| Weight | — | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
