- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EDC09 vs Oclip 2 Ultra
Nitecore EDC09 vs Olight Oclip 2 Ultra
What EDC09 does better (3) and where Oclip 2 Ultra wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Brightness & throw3.0
8.8Battery & charging6.2
5.8Build & durability4.5
5.5Light quality5.5
5.9Features5.9
Why is EDC09 better than Oclip 2 Ultra?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 580 lm2.8×
- Maximum runtime250 h vs 144 h+74%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)153 m vs 130 m+18%
Why is Oclip 2 Ultra better than EDC09?
- Weight114 g vs 80 g+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 580 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 5,850 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 153 m | 130 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 250 h | 144 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX6 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 92.3 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 80 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
