How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. HA13 (2023) vs Nao RL

Nitecore HA13 (2023) vs Petzl Nao RL

What HA13 (2023) does better (0) and where Nao RL wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Nitecore HA13 (2023)
Nitecore · 2023HA13 (2023)
0 advantages
vs
Petzl Nao RL
Petzl · 2022Nao RL
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
4.4Brightness & throw8.5

Why is HA13 (2023) better than Nao RL?

HA13 (2023) has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Nao RL better than HA13 (2023)?

  1. Maximum output350 lm vs 1,500 lm4.3×
  2. Peak beam intensity3,600 cd vs 10,000 cd2.8×
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)120 m vs 200 m+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Petzl Nao RLPetzl Nao RL≈ $1208.0
Light output
Maximum output350 lm1,500 lm
Peak beam intensity3,600 cd10,000 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)120 m200 m
Runtime at maximum output—1,440 min
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)—Yes
Battery & charging
BatteryAAABuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity—3,200 mAh
Maximum runtime—80 h
Rechargeable—Yes
Charging time—3.5 h
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Size & weight
Weight—145 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
Red light—Yes
Motion / reactive sensor—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare