- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HA27 UHE vs NU25 MCT UL
Nitecore HA27 UHE vs Nitecore NU25 MCT UL
What HA27 UHE does better (5) and where NU25 MCT UL wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Brightness & throw5.1
5.1Battery & charging3.5
3.3Build & durability8.8
9.2Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HA27 UHE better than NU25 MCT UL?
- Maximum output800 lm vs 400 lm2×
- Battery capacity1,500 mAh vs 700 mAh2.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)150 m vs 132 m+14%
- Maximum runtime65 h vs 45 h+44%
- Peak beam intensity5,632 cd vs 4,360 cd+29%
Why is NU25 MCT UL better than HA27 UHE?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 5,632 cd | 4,360 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 150 m | 132 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 4 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 97 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 1,500 mAh | 700 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 65 h | 45 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX6 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
