- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HC60 UHE vs UT27 MCT Pro
Nitecore HC60 UHE vs Nitecore UT27 MCT Pro
What HC60 UHE does better (3) and where UT27 MCT Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Brightness & throw6.7
8.8Battery & charging6.0
7.6Build & durability4.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is HC60 UHE better than UT27 MCT Pro?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 800 lm2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Impact resistance (drop)2 m vs 1 m2×
Why is UT27 MCT Pro better than HC60 UHE?
- Weight140 g vs 74 g+89%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)157 m vs 167 m+6%
- Peak beam intensity6,170 cd vs 6,970 cd+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 6,170 cd | 6,970 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 157 m | 167 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 6 | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 200 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 74 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
