- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HC65 MCT vs UT6 MCT
Nitecore HC65 MCT vs Nitecore UT6 MCT
What HC65 MCT does better (4) and where UT6 MCT wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is HC65 MCT better than UT6 MCT?
- Maximum runtime154 h vs 31 h5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)258 m vs 195 m+32%
- Peak beam intensity16,709 cd vs 9,510 cd+76%
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+25%
Why is UT6 MCT better than HC65 MCT?
UT6 MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,709 cd | 9,510 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 258 m | 195 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 8 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 98 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 154 h | 31 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Magnesium | Magnesium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 146 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
