- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HC65M V2.0 vs Nao RL
Nitecore HC65M V2.0 vs Petzl Nao RL
What HC65M V2.0 does better (3) and where Nao RL wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Brightness & throw8.7
8.5Battery & charging6.5
5.9Features5.9
Why is HC65M V2.0 better than Nao RL?
- Maximum output1,750 lm vs 1,500 lm+17%
- Maximum runtime110 h vs 80 h+38%
- Battery capacity3,500 mAh vs 3,200 mAh+9%
Why is Nao RL better than HC65M V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)165 m vs 200 m+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,750 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 165 m | 200 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 1,440 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 145 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
