- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MH10 V2.0 vs MH25 V2.0
Nitecore MH10 V2.0 vs Nitecore MH25 V2.0
What MH10 V2.0 does better (2) and where MH25 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MH10 V2.0MH25 V2.0
| MH10 V2.0 | MH25 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 130 mm | 157 mm | −27 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25 mm | 40 mm | −15 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 137 g | −62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than MH25 V2.0?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Weight75 g vs 137 g+83%
Why is MH25 V2.0 better than MH10 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)232 m vs 475 m2×
- Maximum runtime520 h vs 1,500 h2.9×
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,300 lm+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 232 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XM-L |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 520 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 130 mm | 157 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25 mm | 40 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 137 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
