- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MH11 vs TUP
Nitecore MH11 vs Nitecore TUP
What MH11 does better (2) and where TUP wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is MH11 better than TUP?
- Maximum runtime250 h vs 70 h3.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)189 m vs 180 m+5%
Why is TUP better than MH11?
TUP has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,930 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 189 m | 180 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 250 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 71 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 30 mm |
| Weight | — | 54 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
