How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,011 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. MH12 V2.0 vs Freyr

Nitecore MH12 V2.0 vs Olight Freyr

What MH12 V2.0 does better (1) and where Freyr wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Nitecore MH12 V2.0
Nitecore · 2021MH12 V2.0
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Olight Freyr
Olight · 2021Freyr
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $130
4.7Brightness & throw6.5
9.8Battery & charging9.7
9.6Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

MH12 V2.0Freyr
25 × 15840 × 136
MH12 V2.0FreyrDifference
Length / height158 mm136 mm+22 mm
Head diameter / width25 mm40 mm−15 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MH12 V2.0 better than Freyr?

  1. Maximum runtime1,500 h vs 360 h4.2×

Why is Freyr better than MH12 V2.0?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)202 m vs 360 m+78%
  2. Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,750 lm+46%
Specifications

Side by side

Olight FreyrOlight Freyr≈ $1309.4
Light output
Maximum output1,200 lm1,750 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)202 m360 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime1,500 h360 h
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height158 mm136 mm
Head diameter / width25 mm40 mm
Weight84 g—
Modes & features
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare