- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NPL25 GL vs Oclip 2 Ultra Premium
Nitecore NPL25 GL vs Olight Oclip 2 Ultra Premium
What NPL25 GL does better (3) and where Oclip 2 Ultra Premium wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Brightness & throw3.7
6.0Battery & charging6.4
5.9Build & durability5.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is NPL25 GL better than Oclip 2 Ultra Premium?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)216 m vs 130 m+66%
- Maximum output900 lm vs 580 lm+55%
- Weight74 g vs 80 g+8%
Why is Oclip 2 Ultra Premium better than NPL25 GL?
Oclip 2 Ultra Premium has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 900 lm | 580 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 11,660 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 216 m | 130 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | NiteLab UHi 25 | — |
| LED maker | NiteLab | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 144 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.8 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX6 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx6 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 92.3 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 80 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | Yes | — |
